- Mobile Advertising Network

Mini Chat

JAGDPANTHER - Firing it's main 88mm Gun.

Продолжительность: 00:00:37

The fully restored and fully working SdKfz Foundation Jagdpanther firing it's main gun at a public Military event in 2005 here in the UK. Each of the blanks were specifically made for this gun and were reported to have cost £280 each, very much appreciated being able to see this self propelled gun in action and feel the full force of the blast, even being stood at the rear it was still significant.

Добавить комментарий



Написал: Shane Scaffa, 18.06.2014, 22:32

Since the Jagdpanther was built on the Panther's chasis, I wonder why they didn't put an 88mm on a Panther as well?
Написал: Phil Maplesden, 01.04.2014, 14:28

so where the fuck is the recoil 
Написал: ThePeople'sPanzer, 27.04.2014, 11:34

Pak 43 L71 gun. L71 meaning the barrell is 71 times longer than the calibre (88mm) this is what gave it such a high muzzle velocity and such destructive power. The Tiger 1 had a much less powerful L56. This is the Tiger II's gun.
Написал: Th Eagle, 10.08.2014, 22:33

O my God *-*
Написал: claude kim, 08.02.2014, 19:46

damn! 8.8 << most deadly gun during ww2 :P fuck yea!! 8,8 pak was also a huge ammo for its time... other than the sturm tig lol fires rockets hahah
Написал: Ze Doktor, 09.08.2014, 08:19

It would be cool if it wasn't a blank so you could hear the shell roar in the distance.
Написал: Lightning206, 02.08.2014, 09:05

love that noise
Написал: Battleship009, 30.07.2014, 02:51

Boy there is a crack in it's boom.
Написал: Wm Beeman, 27.03.2014, 05:28

Написал: NJtuber88, 05.07.2014, 17:54

WOW Awesome!!! JP was always my Fav AFV!!!
Написал: Malina Martin, 02.07.2014, 22:49

It is like 100 mm gun sound in war thunder.
Написал: Jason Donze, 02.07.2014, 22:27

22 Shermans dislike the video.
Написал: Boromir Smith, 22.02.2014, 17:45

this sound is so perfect on so many levels
Написал: Anthonest1, 09.03.2014, 23:50

This is fake, theres no recoil.
Написал: Jason Donze, 29.06.2014, 22:03

8.8cm PaK 43
Написал: rancho cucamonga, 28.05.2014, 01:18

would sound a lot different and a lot better with a live round
Написал: Niall Mallon, 19.12.2013, 12:03

The BL-10 never left the testing grounds 
Написал: jonastti, 01.10.2013, 23:52

ALIED tanks in ww2(europe) =180,000. - lost = 140,000. - mechanical break downs or abandoned in battle = 20,000~30,000. - total Tanks destroyed by the Germans = 110,000-120,000. GERMAN tanks in ww2 = 49,777. - mechanical break downs or abandoned in battle = 12%. source - archives.g o v, englishrussia. c o m, Ellis, John statistical surveyWorld War II - A statistical survey and wwiidaybyday. c o m. ????" Few tanks are completely destroyed"??????
Написал: DevSolar, 25.06.2013, 14:12

The "some reason" was the higher muzzle velocity of the L/71 (better balistics and armor penetration).
Написал: soukoutekidanhei, 05.04.2013, 08:33

Написал: jonastti, 30.09.2013, 22:45

TD(Tank Destroyer) had been done to fight over 1.000 km. The only thing that can make a TD stop to shoot, is the penetration, or TD kills you. Armor in a tank, pricipal in ww2, isnt a obsession is a variable that all engeniers in both sides considerated very IMPORTANT. Both are tanks in ww2 Kid, we were talking about ww2, what war are u talkin about? " Few tanks are completely destroyed" -> what? in ww2? *stop to talk shit*
Написал: mandomonkey1, 16.03.2013, 08:44

14 Shermans disliked this.
Написал: Mace Windu, 28.03.2013, 16:10

I doubt that even force could stop this one...
Написал: randomguy9898, 04.11.2013, 13:00

wow, total troll. Read more than 30 seconds. No isu used the bl-10 in real life, or the bl-8. They were both experimental guns that never left the testing grounds.
Написал: jonastti, 20.10.2013, 01:49

No chance...